Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-quic-v2-05
review-ietf-quic-v2-05-dnsdir-lc-cunat-2022-10-12-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-quic-v2
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team DNS Directorate (dnsdir)
Deadline 2022-10-11
Requested 2022-09-27
Authors Martin Duke
Draft last updated 2022-10-12
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -05 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Kyle Rose (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -05 by James Gruessing (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Bo Wu (diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -05 by Vladimír Čunát (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Vladimír Čunát
State Completed
Review review-ietf-quic-v2-05-dnsdir-lc-cunat-2022-10-12
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/4au5YlD-cP80-UMa5WkioeV9DVk
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 10)
Result Ready with Nits
Completed 2022-10-12
review-ietf-quic-v2-05-dnsdir-lc-cunat-2022-10-12-00
I see nothing in the draft affecting DNS specifically (though DoQ and DoH/3
exist).

I noticed one point that would be nice to clarify.  I see
> QUIC version 2 endpoints MUST implement the QUIC version 1
but on the other hand also
> Endpoints that support version 2 might continue support for version 1

and in my eyes these clash, as on protocol level I don't think it's possible to
implement but not support a version, though I'm not very knowledgeable about
QUIC details in particular.  (On SW level that makes sense, but that's not what
the RFC is about.)