Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-raw-use-cases-07
review-ietf-raw-use-cases-07-genart-lc-bryant-2022-10-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-raw-use-cases
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2022-10-06
Requested 2022-09-22
Authors Carlos J. Bernardos , Georgios Z. Papadopoulos , Pascal Thubert , Fabrice Theoleyre
I-D last updated 2022-10-06
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -05 by Victoria Pritchard (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -07 by Joerg Ott (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -08 by Suresh Krishnan (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stewart Bryant
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-raw-use-cases by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/TlFza0OKHajvjTfj3w2mFASfqGM
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 11)
Result Ready
Completed 2022-10-06
review-ietf-raw-use-cases-07-genart-lc-bryant-2022-10-06-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-raw-use-cases-07
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2022-10-06
IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-06
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:

A well written document ready for publication, but note the question on whether
the aero terminology is correct and the comment on haptics.

Major issues:
None

Minor issues:
   Different safety levels need to be supported, from extremely safety
   critical ones requiring low latency, such as a WAKE warning - a
   warning that two aircraft come dangerously close to each other
SB> Is this term correct?
SB> Aircraft proximity is, I think, an AIRPROX event. WAKE I thought applied to
the vortex trails whereby a large aircraft disturbs the air in a way that makes
it unsafe for a smaller aircraft to fly through. It would be useful if an aero
specialist validated the term.

SB> In all the human interaction examples, I am surprised there is no mention
of haptics. A latency failure in a haptic experience can make the participant
feel nauseous and vomit.

Nits/editorial comments:
None