Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-raw-use-cases-08
review-ietf-raw-use-cases-08-intdir-telechat-krishnan-2022-11-28-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-raw-use-cases
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2022-11-26
Requested 2022-10-26
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Carlos J. Bernardos , Georgios Z. Papadopoulos , Pascal Thubert , Fabrice Theoleyre
Draft last updated 2022-11-28
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -05 by Victoria Pritchard (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -07 by Joerg Ott (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -08 by Suresh Krishnan
Assignment Reviewer Suresh Krishnan
State Completed
Review review-ietf-raw-use-cases-08-intdir-telechat-krishnan-2022-11-28
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/3hEYVqqyn0NVojP-MTDC-N7EKZU
Reviewed revision 08
Result Ready with Issues
Completed 2022-11-28
review-ietf-raw-use-cases-08-intdir-telechat-krishnan-2022-11-28-00
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-raw-use-cases.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just
like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve
them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more
details on the INT Directorate, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/.


Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot a NO OBJECTION on this
document. The document is well written and easy to understand. There are a few
minor issues I found that you may wish to address.

Minor issues:

* Section 1

The following text looks a bit out of date since 5G has already been deployed for
quite some time. 

"*  IMT-2020 has recognized Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication
    (URLLC) as a key functionality for the upcoming 5G."

It probably needs to be rewritten.

* Section 2

I know the developments are fairly new but have you considered how LEO
satellite technology affects this area?
 
* Section 4.3

Would it be useful to refer to RFC9030 in addition to RFC7554 to point
to related IETF work?