Telechat Review of draft-ietf-raw-use-cases-08
review-ietf-raw-use-cases-08-intdir-telechat-krishnan-2022-11-28-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-raw-use-cases |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
| Deadline | 2022-11-26 | |
| Requested | 2022-10-26 | |
| Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
| Authors | Carlos J. Bernardos , Georgios Z. Papadopoulos , Pascal Thubert , Fabrice Theoleyre | |
| I-D last updated | 2022-11-28 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -05
by Victoria Pritchard
(diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -07 by Joerg Ott (diff) Genart Last Call review of -07 by Stewart Bryant (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -08 by Suresh Krishnan (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Suresh Krishnan |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-raw-use-cases by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/3hEYVqqyn0NVojP-MTDC-N7EKZU | |
| Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 11) | |
| Result | Ready w/issues | |
| Completed | 2022-11-28 |
review-ietf-raw-use-cases-08-intdir-telechat-krishnan-2022-11-28-00
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review result: Ready with Nits I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-raw-use-cases. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/. Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot a NO OBJECTION on this document. The document is well written and easy to understand. There are a few minor issues I found that you may wish to address. Minor issues: * Section 1 The following text looks a bit out of date since 5G has already been deployed for quite some time. "* IMT-2020 has recognized Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication (URLLC) as a key functionality for the upcoming 5G." It probably needs to be rewritten. * Section 2 I know the developments are fairly new but have you considered how LEO satellite technology affects this area? * Section 4.3 Would it be useful to refer to RFC9030 in addition to RFC7554 to point to related IETF work?