Last Call Review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-23
review-ietf-regext-epp-eai-23-secdir-lc-lonvick-2025-01-22-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 24) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2025-01-27 | |
Requested | 2025-01-13 | |
Authors | Dmitry Belyavsky , James Gould , Scott Hollenbeck | |
I-D last updated | 2025-01-22 | |
Completed reviews |
I18ndir Early review of -15
by Yoshiro Yoneya
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Pete Resnick (diff) Artart Last Call review of -12 by Takahiro Nemoto (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff) Artart Last Call review of -23 by Takahiro Nemoto (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -23 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Chris M. Lonvick |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/rBQ1Zbdg0wPJSuSYyFaW5w8T14M | |
Reviewed revision | 23 (document currently at 24) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2025-01-22 |
review-ietf-regext-epp-eai-23-secdir-lc-lonvick-2025-01-22-00
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is Ready. The document has undergone a lot of changes since I reviewed version 12. The concern I raised at that time has been addressed. Overall, the document is well written and I found no nits. Best regards, Chris