Last Call Review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-01
review-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-01-secdir-lc-murphy-2016-10-20-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2016-10-10 | |
Requested | 2016-09-29 | |
Authors | James Gould | |
I-D last updated | 2016-10-20 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -01
by Robert Sparks
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Sandra L. Murphy (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -01 by Mehmet Ersue (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Sandra L. Murphy |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 04) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2016-10-20 |
review-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-01-secdir-lc-murphy-2016-10-20-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The draft draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping identifies gaps in the mapping of EPP statuses to RDAP statuses that are registered in the IANA RDAP JSON Values Registry. The draft provides entries in the RDAP JSON Values Registry to fill those gaps. I see no security issues with this draft. —Sandy Attachment: signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail