Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-15
review-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-15-dnsdir-lc-wicinski-2024-07-31-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Last Call Review
Team DNS Directorate (dnsdir)
Deadline 2024-08-12
Requested 2024-07-29
Authors Gavin Brown
I-D last updated 2024-07-31
Completed reviews Dnsdir Early review of -09 by Anthony Somerset (diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -15 by Tim Wicinski (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -15 by Takahiro Nemoto (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -15 by Ines Robles (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Wes Hardaker (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -15 by Per Andersson (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tim Wicinski
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl by DNS Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/YYc6K4DRjoiprniGyaQMyIXBETc
Reviewed revision 15 (document currently at 16)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-07-31
review-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-15-dnsdir-lc-wicinski-2024-07-31-00
Hi,

I have been selected as the DNS Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
DNS Directorate seeks to review all DNS or DNS-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the ADs.
For more information about the DNS Directorate, please see
https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/dnsdir

Status:  Minor Nit, Ready to go

I reviewed this document earlier from a request on the regext list, and 
sent some minor feedback which the Author has incorporated into the current version.

I like and approve of the section on Operational Considerations.

## NIT of question

The Nit tool popped these out:

  ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 7451

  -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'XSD-DATATYPES'

Now 7451 seems to be referenced informally by most documents, including most
mapping additions https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7451/referencedby/

I have no opinions currently on the XSD-DATATYPES reference. 

## worthless NIT

In running one of my grammart thingies on the text it complained about this in
Section 10.12 of the change log

    Add *the the* Verisign EPP SDK to Section 9