Last Call Review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-15
review-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-15-dnsdir-lc-wicinski-2024-07-31-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | DNS Directorate (dnsdir) | |
Deadline | 2024-08-12 | |
Requested | 2024-07-29 | |
Authors | Gavin Brown | |
I-D last updated | 2024-07-31 | |
Completed reviews |
Dnsdir Early review of -09
by Anthony Somerset
(diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -15 by Tim Wicinski (diff) Artart Last Call review of -15 by Takahiro Nemoto (diff) Genart Last Call review of -15 by Ines Robles (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Wes Hardaker (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -15 by Per Andersson (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Tim Wicinski |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl by DNS Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/YYc6K4DRjoiprniGyaQMyIXBETc | |
Reviewed revision | 15 (document currently at 16) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2024-07-31 |
review-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-15-dnsdir-lc-wicinski-2024-07-31-00
Hi, I have been selected as the DNS Directorate reviewer for this draft. The DNS Directorate seeks to review all DNS or DNS-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the ADs. For more information about the DNS Directorate, please see https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/dnsdir Status: Minor Nit, Ready to go I reviewed this document earlier from a request on the regext list, and sent some minor feedback which the Author has incorporated into the current version. I like and approve of the section on Operational Considerations. ## NIT of question The Nit tool popped these out: ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 7451 -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'XSD-DATATYPES' Now 7451 seems to be referenced informally by most documents, including most mapping additions https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7451/referencedby/ I have no opinions currently on the XSD-DATATYPES reference. ## worthless NIT In running one of my grammart thingies on the text it complained about this in Section 10.12 of the change log Add *the the* Verisign EPP SDK to Section 9