Last Call Review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search-14
review-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search-14-secdir-lc-housley-2025-02-04-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2025-02-17 | |
Requested | 2025-02-03 | |
Authors | Tom Harrison , Jasdip Singh | |
I-D last updated | 2025-02-04 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -14
by Stewart Bryant
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -14 by Russ Housley (diff) Artart Last Call review of -14 by John R. Levine (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Russ Housley |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/wInptxqAwokemQe-TXbV3nssHZI | |
Reviewed revision | 14 (document currently at 16) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2025-02-04 |
review-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search-14-secdir-lc-housley-2025-02-04-00
I reviewed this document as part of the Security Directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Security Area Directors. Document authors, document editors, and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other IETF Last Call comments. Document: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search-14 Reviewer: Russ Housley Review Date: 2025-02-05 IETF LC End Date: 2025-02-17 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major Concerns: None. Minor Concerns: Section 1: The text talks about "RIR Whois services". Is there a reference for this? If not, would a reference to RFC 3912 be appropriate? Section 3.4: The document says: ~~~ This is acceptable, because this behaviour: does not conflict with the current description of the link relation; and is not generally applicable, but instead limited to the context of RDAP INR objects only. ~~~ I have two comments. First, it is unclear to me what "This" is referencing. Second, the formatting is a bit confusing. Maybe bullets would resolve this concern. Nits: Section 6: Bullets in the first paragraph would be helpful.