Last Call Review of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02
review-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02-genart-lc-romascanu-2021-02-04-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2021-02-08 | |
Requested | 2021-01-25 | |
Authors | Scott Hollenbeck , Andy Newton | |
I-D last updated | 2021-02-04 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -02
by Dan Romascanu
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Stefan Santesson (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Dan Romascanu |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/kLHAKO-oiZOvfyVUcS_iSIp3RLY | |
Reviewed revision | 02 (document currently at 03) | |
Result | Ready w/issues | |
Completed | 2021-02-04 |
review-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02-genart-lc-romascanu-2021-02-04-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02 Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 2021-02-04 IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-08 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This Document is Ready with one issue that I would suggest to clarify and possibly apply edits before approval. Major issues: If my understanding is correct this document together with 7483bis will replace RFC 7482 and RFC 7483 and advance them to Internet Standard. Sections 7 and 8 will be taken out from the final published RFC. I believe that the relationship with RFC 7482 needs to be detailed either in the Introduction or in a dedicated version, in order to clarify for future readers and users the status of the 2 / 4 documents. I also believe that a shortened version of the 'Changes from RFC 7482' section now an Appendix should be included in the text of the document in its final form. Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: