Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05
review-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05-genart-lc-melnikov-2014-08-03-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-08-13
Requested 2014-07-31
Authors Randell Jesup , Zaheduzzaman Sarker
I-D last updated 2014-08-03
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -05 by Alexey Melnikov (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Steve Hanna (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Fred Baker (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -06 by Fred Baker (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -07 by Fred Baker (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Alexey Melnikov
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2014-08-03
review-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05-genart-lc-melnikov-2014-08-03-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05
Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
Review Date: 3-Aug-2014
IETF LC End Date: 13-Aug-2014
IESG Telechat date: N/A



Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC 


[ready with comments]




Major issues: None
Minor issues:



In Section 1: RMCAT is not explained/expanded, when mentioned for the 


first time. Does this acronym need to be in the published RFC, e.g. 


would it be useful for readers reading this document 10 years later?




RTP and RTCP need references.



In general, I found this document not to be very friendly to people who 


don't follow RMCAT.




Nits/editorial comments: None