Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
review-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10-secdir-telechat-kivinen-2021-04-12-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type Telechat Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2021-04-20
Requested 2021-04-07
Authors Charles E. Perkins , S.V.R Anand , Satish Anamalamudi , Bing (Remy) Liu
Draft last updated 2021-04-12
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Tero Kivinen (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -10 by Tero Kivinen (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -10 by Peter Van der Stok (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tero Kivinen
State Completed
Review review-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10-secdir-telechat-kivinen-2021-04-12
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/KR64Gt_ff5w7efwDFLmBFBZdmYs
Reviewed revision 10 (document currently at 14)
Result Has Nits
Completed 2021-04-12
review-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10-secdir-telechat-kivinen-2021-04-12-00
This is rereview of this document. Some of my comments from the previous review
were not properly implemented. I.e., even when the figure changed the reserved
field in section 4.3 to be 'X' instead of 'r', the text listing fields still
refers to it as 'r'.

Also the acronym format is not not consistent, i.e., either pick format of
"long name (ACRONYM)" or "ACRONYM (long name)", and do not use both of them.
Now there is still acronyms RPL, DIO, and MOP in section 1 using different
format than what for example acronyms DODAG, P2P, DAO in same section.