Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-39
review-ietf-roll-dao-projection-39-opsdir-telechat-chen-2025-03-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 40)
Type Telechat Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2025-03-04
Requested 2025-01-23
Authors Pascal Thubert , Rahul Jadhav , Michael Richardson
I-D last updated 2026-01-29 (Latest revision 2025-03-11)
Completed reviews Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -32 by Susan Hares (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -31 by Klaas Wierenga (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -36 by Michael Scharf (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -39 by Ran Chen (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Ran Chen
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection by Ops Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/B0dSM0R1fWbV8-SuOY_RCCzEWg4
Reviewed revision 39 (document currently at 40)
Result Has nits
Completed 2025-03-05
review-ietf-roll-dao-projection-39-opsdir-telechat-chen-2025-03-05-00
# OPSDIR review of draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in the last call may be
included in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs
should treat these comments just like any other last-call comments.

This document extends RFC 6550, RFC 6553, and RFC 8138, introducing the DAO
Projection
 mechanism to enhance RPL. It enables the RPL root or an external controller to
 proactively install optimized routes, improving routing efficiency,
 reliability, and resource utilization. Additionally, the draft addresses
 backward compatibility, all nodes involved in P-DAO processing must support
 this specification. The document is clear and well-written. The motivation is
 described well. The document is almost ready for publication.
## Nits
-I suggest BCP14 (may=> MAY, should=>SHOULD, must => MUST) change
-The document use TrackID, Trackid, trackID, it is recommended to unify them.
-s/additional paths betwwen nodes/ additional paths between nodes/
-s/ oriented From Ingress / oriented from Ingress /
-s/ Building Tracks With RPL/ Building Tracks with RPL/
-s/ edges leads to/ edges lead to/
-s /may be ommitted/ may be omitted/
-s/ The latter is often is preferred/ The latter is often preferred/
-s/ the position preceeding the one/ the position preceding the one/
-s/ The (suggected)/ The (suggested)/