Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop-05
review-ietf-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop-05-genart-lc-housley-2016-02-26-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-03-09
Requested 2016-02-25
Authors Stephane Proust
I-D last updated 2016-02-26
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -05 by Russ Housley (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Will (Shucheng) LIU (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Russ Housley
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 06)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2016-02-26
review-ietf-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop-05-genart-lc-housley-2016-02-26-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop-05
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review Date: 2016-02-26
IETF LC End Date: 2016-03-09
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary:  Ready


Major Concerns: None


Minor Concerns:

Section 4.1 talks about AMR-WB, and Section 4.2 talks about AMR.  The
two sections depend upon each other.  Please add some kind of notice to
Section 4.1 so that the reader is not surprised.


Other Editorial Comments:

Section 4.1.2: s/offering "HD Voice" A high/offering "HD Voice". A high/