Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-12

Request Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-10-23
Requested 2014-10-16
Authors Randell Jesup , Salvatore Loreto , Michael Tüxen
I-D last updated 2014-10-30
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -12 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -12 by David Harrington (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Vijay K. Gurbani
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 12 (document currently at 13)
Result Ready
Completed 2014-10-30
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-12
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: Oct-29-2014
IETF LC End Date: Oct-23-2014
IESG Telechat date: Oct-30-2014

This document is ready as a Proposed Standard.

Major: 0
Minor: 1
Nits: 1

Minor: 1
- S3.1, U-C 1: Why is it important to specify tha "there may be no
 SRTP media channels, or all SRTP media channels may be inactive"?
 It seems to me that all you care about is data channels, not
 media channels.  As such, retaining the last phrase ("there may also
 be reliable data channels in use") suffices, no?

 (Same comment for S3.2, U-C 3).
 (Same comment for S4, Req. 1.  This makes me wonder if I am missing
  something germane here with respect to you listing the availability
  or unavailability of SRTP media streams/channels.  If so, please
  let me know.)

Editorial nits:
- S6.4, opening paragraph:
   s/One strong wish is/It is advantageous/


- vijay
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{,} / vijay.gurbani at

  | Calendar: