Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-21
review-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-21-opsdir-lc-martinez-2017-08-16-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 24)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2017-08-11
Requested 2017-07-28
Other Reviews Secdir Last Call review of -23 by Phillip Hallam-Baker (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -21 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Carlos Martinez
Review review-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-21-opsdir-lc-martinez-2017-08-16
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/KJuszY6gExdLlaR01Y0yji6Z3nE
Reviewed rev. 21 (document currently at 24)
Review result Ready
Draft last updated 2017-08-16
Review completed: 2017-08-16

Review
review-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-21-opsdir-lc-martinez-2017-08-16

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Noting that I'm certainly not an expert on the subject matter, I've found this document to be READY. I found it well-written, it contains plenty of detailed examples (which I believe are really important for API and programming-heavy documents), and includes plenty of references as well.

Please do not forget to remove "Appendix B.  Change log".

A minor observation, not even a nit, is that the text in the Security Considerations "While formally the JSEP interface is an API, it is better to think of it is an Internet protocol, with the JS being untrustworthy from the perspective of the endpoint. " could be more clear.

thanks!

/Carlos