Skip to main content

Early Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp-13
review-ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp-13-tsvart-early-tuexen-2022-02-11-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp-12
Requested revision 12 (document currently at 26)
Type Early Review
Team Transport Area Review Team (tsvart)
Deadline 2022-02-11
Requested 2022-01-13
Requested by Yingzhen Qu
Authors Fred Templin , Greg Saccone , Gaurav Dawra , Acee Lindem , Victor Moreno
I-D last updated 2022-02-11
Completed reviews Secdir Early review of -12 by Russ Housley (diff)
Intdir Early review of -12 by Dave Thaler (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -12 by Gyan Mishra (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -12 by Mach Chen (diff)
Tsvart Early review of -13 by Michael Tüxen (diff)
Comments
The document is ready for WG last call in RTGWG. The chairs would really appreciate broader review of the document. Thanks!
Assignment Reviewer Michael Tüxen
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp by Transport Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/J4N_drR40d-h2oc8blR_LOnGy2U
Reviewed revision 13 (document currently at 26)
Result Ready
Completed 2022-02-11
review-ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp-13-tsvart-early-tuexen-2022-02-11-00
The document mentions that some data links used by aircrafts today only provide
a bandwidth in the order of 32 Kbps. Any protocols using these links should be
parametrised for that bandwidth and parametrisation might not be the default
one used in todays links used in the Internet. However, if I understand the
document correctly, the BGP communication described in this document is not
using these links and therefore I see no issues with respect to transport
protocol considerations.