Telechat Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-11
review-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-11-genart-telechat-romascanu-2016-06-13-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2016-06-14 | |
Requested | 2016-05-27 | |
Authors | Petr Lapukhov , Ariff Premji , Jon Mitchell | |
I-D last updated | 2016-06-13 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Telechat review of -10
by Dan Romascanu
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -11 by Dan Romascanu Secdir Telechat review of -09 by Yoav Nir (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -11 by Yoav Nir Opsdir Telechat review of -09 by Lionel Morand (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -01 by Danny R. McPherson (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -05 by Susan Hares (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -09 by Acee Lindem (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Dan Romascanu |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 11 | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2016-06-13 |
review-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-11-genart-telechat-romascanu-2016-06-13-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at < https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq >. Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 6/13 IETF LC End Date: 6/6 IESG Telechat date: 6/16 Summary: The document is ready. It explains in a clear and detailed manner the operational experience in the design of large data centers using L3 only devices, Clos topology and BGP as routing protocol. I am not a routing expert, so I cannot validate all the statements made in the document, but the explanation seems clear and makes sense. The only comment I had in my IETF LC review was related to the lack of expansion of some of the acronyms (e.g. ASN, FIB ,etc.) – the issue was fixed in the revised version (11). Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: