Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-13
review-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-13-secdir-lc-yu-2013-12-19-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2013-12-09 | |
| Requested | 2013-11-28 | |
| Authors | Curtis Villamizar , Dave McDysan , Ning So , Andrew G. Malis , Lucy Yong | |
| I-D last updated | 2013-12-19 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -10
by Francis Dupont
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -13 by Francis Dupont (diff) Genart Telechat review of -15 by Francis Dupont (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Taylor Yu (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Taylor Yu (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -13 by Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU) (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Taylor Yu |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 13 (document currently at 16) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2013-12-19 |
review-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-13-secdir-lc-yu-2013-12-19-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The previous concerns I have had with a prior revision of this document seem to have been resolved adequately. There appear to be no security concerns introduced by revisions since my last review.