Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-13
review-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-13-secdir-lc-yu-2013-12-19-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2013-12-09 | |
| Requested | 2013-11-28 | |
| Authors | Curtis Villamizar , Dave McDysan , Ning So , Andrew G. Malis , Lucy Yong | |
| I-D last updated | 2018-12-20 (Latest revision 2014-02-06) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -10
by Francis Dupont
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -13 by Francis Dupont (diff) Genart Telechat review of -15 by Francis Dupont (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -10 by Taylor Yu (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -13 by Taylor Yu (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -13 by Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU) (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Taylor Yu |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 13 (document currently at 16) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2013-12-19 |
review-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-13-secdir-lc-yu-2013-12-19-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The previous concerns I have had with a prior revision of this document seem to have been resolved adequately. There appear to be no security concerns introduced by revisions since my last review.