Skip to main content

Early Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-revive-04
review-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-revive-04-intdir-early-hinden-2025-09-19-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-revive
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Early Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2025-09-19
Requested 2025-09-04
Requested by Yingzhen Qu
Authors David 'equinox' Lamparter , Anton Smirnov , Jen Linkova , Shu Yang , Mingwei Xu
I-D last updated 2025-09-14 (Latest revision 2025-09-14)
Completed reviews Opsdir Early review of -04 by Linda Dunbar
Secdir Early review of -04 by Jacqueline McCall
Intdir Early review of -04 by Bob Hinden
Rtgdir Early review of -04 by Mach Chen
Assignment Reviewer Bob Hinden
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-revive by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/WfZ-ON38-TDrpDWvTNftfo4_Ywc
Reviewed revision 04
Result On the right track
Completed 2025-09-19
review-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-revive-04-intdir-early-hinden-2025-09-19-00
I reviewed this from the Int-dir view point, and didn't get into the routing
protocol specifics.

The issue I noticed in Section 3.3 was it wasn't clear how long it would take
to complete the prefix lookups.   It would be helpful if this could be expanded
and perhaps provide some examples given some expected topologies.   Especially
since happens on a per packet it could have an impact on router forwarding
rates if it goes on for a long time.

I also have some editorial suggestions, I will send these to the authors
directly.