Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-08

Request Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-06-18
Requested 2015-06-11
Authors Pushpasis Sarkar , Stephane Litkowski , Bruno Decraene , Clarence Filsfils , Syed Kamran Raza , Martin Horneffer
I-D last updated 2015-06-25
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -08 by Alexey Melnikov (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Magnus Nyström (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Ron Bonica (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -07 by Hannes Gredler (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Alexey Melnikov
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 11)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2015-06-25
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at


Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-08.txt
Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
Review Date: 2015-06-25
IETF LC End Date: 2015-06-18
IESG Telechat date: 2015-06-25

Summary: Ready with nits.

Major issues:  None

Minor issues:

In Section 3.3 - did you mean R5 when talking about P5? I've searched 

multiple times and couldn't find it on the picture.

In 6.2.1:

When selecting the best alternate, the selection algorithm MUST
consider all available alternates (connected or tunnel).  Especially,
computation of PQ set ([I-D.ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa]) SHOULD be
performed before best alternate selection.

The SHOULD level requirement makes the reference Normative, while it is 

listed as Informative.