Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-08
review-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-08-opsdir-lc-bonica-2015-06-23-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2015-06-18 | |
| Requested | 2015-06-08 | |
| Authors | Pushpasis Sarkar , Stephane Litkowski , Bruno Decraene , Clarence Filsfils , Syed Raza , Martin Horneffer | |
| Draft last updated | 2015-06-23 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -08
by
Alexey Melnikov
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Magnus Nystrom (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Ron Bonica (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -07 by Hannes Gredler (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Ron Bonica |
| State | Completed Snapshot | |
| Review |
review-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-08-opsdir-lc-bonica-2015-06-23
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 11) | |
| Result | Has Nits | |
| Completed | 2015-06-23 |
review-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-08-opsdir-lc-bonica-2015-06-23-00
Folks, I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document is on the Standards Track. It provides operational feedback on LFA, highlights some limitations, and proposes a set of refinements to address those limitations. It also proposes required management specifications. The document is well-written and nearly ready for publication. Major Issues ---------------- None Minor Issues --------------- - Please run this document through the NIT checker and address the NITS - I am not sure how the sitting IESG feels about the use of lowercase "must", "should" and "may". You may want to check this before the IESG review. Ron Bonica