IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan-14
review-ietf-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan-14-rtgdir-lc-venaas-2026-07-13-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 15)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2026-07-14
Requested 2026-06-23
Requested by Jim Guichard
Authors Kausik Majumdar , Linda Dunbar , Venkit Kasiviswanathan , Ashok Ramchandra , Aseem Choudhary
I-D last updated 2026-08-04 (Latest revision 2026-08-04)
Completed reviews Secdir Early review of -05 by Jon Geater (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -04 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -07 by Gabriele Galimberti (diff)
Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -14 by Stig Venaas (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -13 by Russ Housley (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -13 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stig Venaas
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/bl6TPKNrcSkhCHoeoVBONEfJxY4
Reviewed revision 14 (document currently at 15)
Result Has issues
Completed 2026-07-13
review-ietf-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan-14-rtgdir-lc-venaas-2026-07-13-00
The document is in good shape and easy to read.

The one issue I have is that new protocol is defined in the security
considerations. Among other things it defines a new sub-TLV. It would be better
to move the new protocol definitions to a separate section.