Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-06
review-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-06-secdir-lc-xia-2018-01-19-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 12) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2018-01-31 | |
| Requested | 2018-01-17 | |
| Authors | Lou Berger , Christian Hopps , Acee Lindem , Dean Bogdanović , Xufeng Liu | |
| Draft last updated | 2018-01-19 | |
| Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors Early review of -02
by
Martin Björklund
(diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -02 by John Scudder (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Liang Xia (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Liang Xia |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-06-secdir-lc-xia-2018-01-19
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 12) | |
| Result | Has Issues | |
| Completed | 2018-01-19 |
review-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-06-secdir-lc-xia-2018-01-19-00
For the section of Security Considerations: 1. you may refer to templete in https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines to add some required general security considerations; 2. According to the above templete, [RFC5246], [RFC6241], [RFC6242], [RFC6536], and [RFC8040] must be "normative references"; 3. I don't see the security consideration content about the readable data nodes. Is it missed, or there are not such readable date nodes need to be considered?