Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-09

Request Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2018-12-18
Requested 2018-12-04
Authors Stephane Litkowski , Bruno Decraene , Martin Horneffer
I-D last updated 2019-01-07
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -03 by Tomonori Takeda (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -08 by Tomonori Takeda (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Phillip Hallam-Baker (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Tim Chown
Assignment Reviewer Phillip Hallam-Baker
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 10)
Result Has issues
Completed 2019-01-07
The document describes the problem and solution pretty clearly. Unfortunately,
there is no discussion of the security considerations which is not appropriate
for a document addressing an availability which is a security issue.

While microloops can form by chance, some consideration should be given to the
possibility that an attacker could induce a loop to perform a DoS attack.