Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-10
review-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-10-opsdir-lc-chown-2019-01-28-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2018-12-18
Requested 2018-12-04
Authors Stephane Litkowski , Bruno Decraene , Martin Horneffer
I-D last updated 2019-01-28
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -03 by Tomonori Takeda (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -08 by Tomonori Takeda (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Phillip Hallam-Baker (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Tim Chown
Assignment Reviewer Tim Chown
State Completed Snapshot
Review review-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-10-opsdir-lc-chown-2019-01-28
Reviewed revision 10
Result Ready
Completed 2019-01-28
review-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-10-opsdir-lc-chown-2019-01-28-00
Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This draft looks at the impact of using different link state IGPs on transient
micro-loops that may occur between two or more routers in a hop-by-hop 
packet forwarding scenario, usually caused when formed when two routers
fail to update their FIBs for a given prefix at the same time.

While a final conclusion section would be desirable,  the document is otherwise
ready for publication.