Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06

Request Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-10-04
Requested 2017-09-20
Authors Stephane Litkowski, Bruno Decraene, Clarence Filsfils, Pierre Francois
Draft last updated 2017-09-27
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -01 by Matthew Bocci (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Melinda Shore (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Roni Even (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06-genart-lc-even-2017-09-27
Reviewed rev. 06 (document currently at 09)
Review result Ready with Nits
Review completed: 2017-09-27


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2017-09-27
IETF LC End Date: 2017-10-04
IESG Telechat date: 2017-10-12

The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with nits

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: 

1. Abbreviation like RIB and FIB are not expanded
2. In section 9.1 "more simple" should be "simpler" 
3. In section 9.1 " does not enough provide enough bandwidth"  to " does not provide enough bandwidth" 
4. In section 9.2 "a mechanism where the convergence of the  network upon a topology change is made ordered to prevent transient forwarding loops"  is difficult to read maybe
"a mechanism where the convergence of the network upon a topology change is ordered in order to prevent transient forwarding loops"