Early Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd-15
review-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd-15-secdir-early-melnikov-2026-08-06-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2026-08-07 | |
| Requested | 2026-07-15 | |
| Requested by | Yingzhen Qu | |
| Authors | Greg Mirsky , Jeff Tantsura , Gyan Mishra | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-08-02 (Latest revision 2026-08-02) | |
| Completed reviews |
Opsdir Early review of -06
by Joe Clarke
(diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -08 by Emmanuel Baccelli (diff) Secdir Early review of -08 by Alexey Melnikov (diff) Opsdir Early review of -14 by Joe Clarke (diff) Secdir Early review of -15 by Alexey Melnikov Rtgdir Early review of -14 by Mike McBride (diff) |
|
| Comments |
The draft has gone through major changes based on the comments received. Please review and see if the draft is ready for WGLC. |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Alexey Melnikov |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/G_jDKXHNeU5cWaBvvFsoZm0oFyE | |
| Reviewed revision | 15 | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2026-08-06 |
review-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd-15-secdir-early-melnikov-2026-08-06-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. I've done an earlier review of -08 and I thought it was ready back then. The document has changed, but I think addition of operational issues is an improvement. The document is short and well-written. The security considerations section is also short and redirect readers to referenced documents: [RFC9568], [RFC5880], [RFC5881], and [RFC8562]. I agree that this is an appropriate list of documents to consult when reviewing security of the overall system.