Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-15

Request Review of draft-ietf-sacm-requirements
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2017-06-05
Requested 2017-05-22
Authors Nancy Cam-Winget , Lisa Lorenzin
I-D last updated 2017-05-30
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -15 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -16 by Ron Bonica (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Barry Leiba
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-sacm-requirements by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 15 (document currently at 18)
Result Has nits
Completed 2017-05-30
While I'm calling this document "ready", I really don't see why it should be
published in the RFC series at all.  It's well written, and it seems to be
important material for the working group to use as it develops the SACM 
architecture, data model and transport protocols, but does not seem to be of
lasting interest after those are done.  I'd rather see it in the working group
wiki, and used that way.

That said, I know the working group wants it published and that my comment here
is likely not to go far, so I'll say that if it's to be published as an RFC,
it's ready.  The one nit I note is that in the XML "title" element you appear
to have abbrev="Abbreviated Title", rather than the more likely abbrev="SACM