Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-16
review-ietf-sacm-requirements-16-opsdir-lc-bonica-2017-06-19-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-sacm-requirements |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 18) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2017-06-05 | |
Requested | 2017-05-22 | |
Authors | Nancy Cam-Winget , Lisa Lorenzin | |
I-D last updated | 2017-06-19 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -15
by Francis Dupont
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Barry Leiba (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -16 by Ron Bonica (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Ron Bonica |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-sacm-requirements by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 16 (document currently at 18) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2017-06-19 |
review-ietf-sacm-requirements-16-opsdir-lc-bonica-2017-06-19-00
Folks, I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Summary: Ready for publication This document defines the scope and set of requirements for the Secure Automation and Continuous Monitoring (SACM) architecture, data model and transport protocols. The draft is important. I would vote "YES". Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits: - One outdated reference