Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical-08
review-ietf-sfc-hierarchical-08-secdir-lc-turner-2018-05-29-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2018-05-21
Requested 2018-05-07
Other Reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -08 by Ines Robles (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Vijay Gurbani (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Sean Turner
Review review-ietf-sfc-hierarchical-08-secdir-lc-turner-2018-05-29
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/s9mtOhfuW1bfB3Jxt-pmJ7zfqCE
Reviewed rev. 08 (document currently at 10)
Review result Ready
Draft last updated 2018-05-29
Review completed: 2018-05-29

Review
review-ietf-sfc-hierarchical-08-secdir-lc-turner-2018-05-29

Hi! I’m no expert on SFC so I spent some time reviewing RFC7665 and Simon Josefsson’s secdir review [0] as well as RFC 8300 and 8393.  It looks like all the things I was going to pick on are addressed by the references.

I’ll let somebody else on the IESG debate whether Figure 4 is trying to be a little different than the rest of this architectural document by specify some protocols bits; informational still?

[0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-sfc-architecture-08-secdir-lc-josefsson-2015-05-28/