Last Call Review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
review-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05-rtgdir-lc-leymann-2023-01-23-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2023-01-23
Requested 2023-01-09
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Authors Mirja Kühlewind , Jonathan Reed , Rich Salz
I-D last updated 2023-01-23
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -05 by Nicolai Leymann (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -05 by Dr. John C. Klensin (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Kyle Rose (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Gyan Mishra (diff)
Comments 
Not a routing document.  We want an extra pair of eyes on the proposal about online meeting participation.
Assignment Reviewer Nicolai Leymann
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/-B-Xf_FRjMA3fLlxakQ4Ro1dYyI
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready
Completed 2023-01-23
review-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05-rtgdir-lc-leymann-2023-01-23-00
Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs.
For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would
be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call
comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by
updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
Reviewer: Nicolai Leymann
Review Date: 2023-01-23
Intended Status: Best Current Practice

Summary:
This document outlines a principle for open participation that
extends the open process principle defined in RFC3935 by stating that
there must always be a free option for online participation to IETF
meetings and, if possible, related IETF-hosted events over the
Internet.

No issues found. This document is well written, easy to understand and ready
for publication.

Comments:
None

Major Issues:
None

Minor Issues:
None

Nits:
None