Last Call Review of draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05
review-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05-secdir-lc-rose-2023-01-11-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2023-01-23 | |
| Requested | 2023-01-09 | |
| Authors | Mirja Kühlewind , Jonathan Reed , Rich Salz | |
| I-D last updated | 2023-01-11 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -05
by Nicolai Leymann
(diff)
Artart Last Call review of -05 by Dr. John C. Klensin (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Kyle Rose (diff) Genart Last Call review of -05 by Gyan Mishra (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Kyle Rose |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/MenIn3wgAa724BSkyzBqbBqr4TE | |
| Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 09) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2023-01-11 |
review-ietf-shmoo-remote-fee-05-secdir-lc-rose-2023-01-11-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document is Ready. It introduces no technical security or privacy concerns.