Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12
review-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12-genart-lc-even-2016-12-15-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-12-21
Requested 2016-12-07
Authors Randy Bush
I-D last updated 2016-12-15
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Rich Salz (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -12 by Roni Even (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Sheng Jiang (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 12 (document currently at 16)
Result Almost ready
Completed 2016-12-15
review-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12-genart-lc-even-2016-12-15-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these
comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:
draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2016-12-15 IETF
LC End Date: 2016–12-22 IESG Telechat date:

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a BCP RFC.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

I think the document need an editorial review, a lot of text in passive
language, for example third paragraph in section 1 "BGPsec needs to be spoken
only by an AS's eBGP speaking, AKA border, routers, and is designed so that it
can be used to protect  announcements which are originated by resource
constrained edge  routers." is written in passive language and it is also a
long sentence.