Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12
review-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12-genart-lc-even-2016-12-15-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-12-21
Requested 2016-12-07
Authors Randy Bush
Draft last updated 2016-12-15
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Rich Salz (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -12 by Roni Even (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Sheng Jiang (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even 
State Completed Snapshot
Review review-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12-genart-lc-even-2016-12-15
Reviewed rev. 12 (document currently at 16)
Review result Almost Ready
Review completed: 2016-12-15

Review
review-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12-genart-lc-even-2016-12-15

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date:2016-12-15
IETF LC End Date: 2016–12-22
IESG Telechat date:  

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a BCP RFC.


Major issues:

Minor issues:


Nits/editorial comments:

I think the document need an editorial review, a lot of text in passive language, for example third paragraph in section 1
"BGPsec needs to be spoken only by an AS's eBGP speaking, AKA border, routers, and is designed so that it can be used to protect  announcements which are originated by resource constrained edge  routers." is written in passive language and it is also a long sentence.