Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-04

Request Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-11-27
Requested 2013-10-31
Authors Randy Bush , Rob Austein , Keyur Patel , Hannes Gredler , Matthias Wählisch
Draft last updated 2013-12-03
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -04 by Suresh Krishnan (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Gunter Van de Velde (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Suresh Krishnan
State Completed
Review review-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-04-genart-lc-krishnan-2013-12-03
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 05)
Result Ready
Completed 2013-12-03
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see


Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before
posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-04.txt
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
Review Date: 2013/12/03
IESG Telechat date: 2013/12/05

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC but 

I do have a few comments that the authors may wish to consider.


* Section 4

-> The sequences specified in this section do not map directly onto the 

sequences mentioned in Section 6 of RFC6810. Not sure why there is a 


-> It is unclear what the following footnote means since the row is 

concerning S2 and Section 6.2 of RFC6810 is the one that deals with a 

typical exchange.

"1) NO, we always respond as described in 6.3 of [RFC6810]"

* Section 5

RFC6810 does talk about IPsec as a transport at a SHOULD level, but it 

is not at all covered here in the support table.