Telechat Review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-06
review-ietf-sidr-slurm-06-rtgdir-telechat-wijnands-2018-02-27-00

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs.
For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would
be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call
comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by
updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-06
Reviewer: IJsbrand Wijnands
Review Date: 27-02-2018
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary:

• This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be
considered prior to publication.

Comments:

This document reads ok.

Minor issues:

It seems to me it would be useful to have a "Terminology and Definitions”
section where the various acronyms are defined. That would help readers who are
less familiar in this area (like myself) to parse the document.

Nits:

1. Introduction
+++++++++++++++

* What is a "putative TAs”? Its not declared anywhere.

* What is a “ROAs”? Should there be a RFC reference here?

2. RPKI RPs with SLURM
++++++++++++++++++++++

* What are “RPs”? Its not declared anywhere.

3.3.  SLURM Target
++++++++++++++++++

* "A SLURM filer”, is that a filter or file?