Early Review of draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile-26
review-ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile-26-secdir-early-salz-2026-06-08-01
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 29) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2026-07-03 | |
| Requested | 2026-06-05 | |
| Requested by | Luigi Iannone | |
| Authors | Job Snijders , Alexander Azimov , Eugene Uskov , Randy Bush , Russ Housley , Ben Maddison | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-08-03 (Latest revision 2026-07-29) | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Early review of -26
by Rich Salz
(diff)
Bgpdir Early review of -27 by Srihari R. Sangli (diff) Artart Early review of -27 by Gavin Brown (diff) Genart Early review of -27 by Peter E. Yee (diff) |
|
| Comments |
This document is part of a cluster of documents thightly related, namely: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification/ If possible, it would make sense that the assigned reviewer for this document is willing to review the other two documents. The plan is to have early reviews for all the three documents before IETF 126. Thanks |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Rich Salz |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 26 (document currently at 29) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2026-06-08 |
review-ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile-26-secdir-early-salz-2026-06-08-01
I reviewed this document as part of the Security Directorate which tries to review all drafts. Treat this as any other comments. I have no technical comments to make. The ASN.1 makes sense, as I would expect, and the bulk of this documenting is explaining the semantics of the object fields. "DEFAULT 0" paired with "must be 1" for the id field is cute. I don't understand why the "contribution" is a separate section, and not a separate paragraph in the Acknowledgement.