IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sidrops-avoid-rpki-state-in-bgp-06
review-ietf-sidrops-avoid-rpki-state-in-bgp-06-genart-lc-kyzivat-2026-05-24-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-sidrops-avoid-rpki-state-in-bgp |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2026-05-27 | |
| Requested | 2026-05-13 | |
| Authors | Job Snijders , Tobias Fiebig , Massimiliano Stucchi | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-06-12 (Latest revision 2026-06-12) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -06
by Paul Kyzivat
(diff)
Bgpdir Early review of -09 by John Scudder (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Scott G. Kelly (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -09 by Scott G. Kelly (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Paul Kyzivat |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-sidrops-avoid-rpki-state-in-bgp by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/5kFxO6tq7duJ4FCwiVOmgJ7FtQI/ | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 11) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2026-05-24 |
review-ietf-sidrops-avoid-rpki-state-in-bgp-06-genart-lc-kyzivat-2026-05-24-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at: <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-sidrops-avoid-rpki-state-in-bgp-06 Title: Guidance to Avoid Carrying RPKI Validation States in Transitive BGP Path Attributes Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat Review Date: 2026-05-23 IETF LC End Date: 2026-05-27 IESG Telechat date: ? Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Best Current Practice RFC. Comment: One thing to look at: The "Workgroup" item in the header is "Network Working Group". I think it should be "SIDEROPS". (I didn't think this deserved formally raising as an issue. I see the same problem in many documents.)