Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-rollover-02

Request Review of draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-rollover
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-10-17
Requested 2017-10-03
Authors Brian Weis , Roque Gagliano , Keyur Patel
I-D last updated 2017-10-09
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -02 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -02 by Daniele Ceccarelli (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Francis Dupont
State Completed Snapshot
Review review-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-rollover-02-genart-lc-dupont-2017-10-09
Reviewed revision 02 (document currently at 04)
Result Ready
Completed 2017-10-09
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-rollover-02.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20171007
IETF LC End Date: 20171017
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: 
 IMHO the language itself needs some improvements. Unfortunately I am not
 a native English writer so I can only be a limited help...

 - Abstract page 1: bad wording in
  "... certificates BGPsec router certificates"

 - Abstract page 1: Normal -> normal

 - Abstract page 1: "creating" does not fit in grammar. Perhaps
  "which create"?

 - Abstract page 1: I suggest accomplished -> performed
  (this point is typical of why a native English writer will really help)

 - ToC page 2 and 4/4.2 page 7: titles of 4 and 4.2 are too close

 - ToC page 2 and 7 page 9: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

 - 2 page 2: I suggest
  the local policies of a network. -> the local policies of network.

 - 2 page 3: as the 2119 lowe case keyword issue is now solved you may
  use "may" as in "documents may reference" but perhaps with an upgrade
  to the standard 2119 reference text. I am asking to the gen-art what
  to do (and I expect to get an answer before the LC).

 - 2 page 3, 3.1 and 4 page 6:
   roll-over -> rollover (i.e. keep one spelling)

 - 4.2 page 7: i.e. -> i.e.,