Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sidrops-https-tal-07
review-ietf-sidrops-https-tal-07-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2019-03-18-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-sidrops-https-tal |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2019-03-18 | |
Requested | 2019-03-04 | |
Authors | Geoff Huston , Samuel Weiler , George G. Michaelson , Stephen Kent , Tim Bruijnzeels | |
I-D last updated | 2019-03-18 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -07
by Pete Resnick
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Linda Dunbar (diff) Rtgdir Telechat review of -07 by John Drake (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Linda Dunbar |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-sidrops-https-tal by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 08) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2019-03-18 |
review-ietf-sidrops-https-tal-07-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2019-03-18-00
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar Review result: Ready with Comments & Nits I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document defines the syntax of Trust Anchor Locator (TAL) for Replying Parties to retrieve the Trust Anchor, to avoid repeating the distribution procedure when Trust Anchor changes. My question: if the Trust Anchor changes, does the URI in the TAL changes? Another questions: Section 2.4 Example: is the Public Key listed there for both URI? Typo: Section 2.1 second paragraph: "without needing to effect..", do you mean "without needing to affect ..?? Cheers, Linda Dunbar