Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-rsc-10
review-ietf-sidrops-rpki-rsc-10-genart-lc-bryant-2022-08-24-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-rsc
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2022-08-24
Requested 2022-08-10
Authors Job Snijders , Tom Harrison , Ben Maddison
I-D last updated 2022-08-24
Completed reviews Artart Last Call review of -08 by Russ Housley (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stewart Bryant
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-rsc by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/osm7kWl75K8S6I4tvWACqYSrKuc
Reviewed revision 10 (document currently at 11)
Result Ready
Completed 2022-08-24
review-ietf-sidrops-rpki-rsc-10-genart-lc-bryant-2022-08-24-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-rsc-10
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2022-08-24
IETF LC End Date: 2022-08-24
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:A well written document ready for publication

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: I did spend a bunch of time agonising over whether the
term checklist was used in the normal meaning of the term and in the end
concluded that it was, but a sentence somewhere setting the reader at ease
would be useful.