Last Call Review of draft-ietf-simple-chat-
review-ietf-simple-chat-genart-lc-krishnan-2012-02-27-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-simple-chat |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 18) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2012-02-06 | |
Requested | 2012-02-10 | |
Authors | Aki Niemi , Miguel Angel García , Geir Sandbakken | |
I-D last updated | 2012-02-27 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -??
by Christer Holmberg
Genart Last Call review of -?? by Suresh Krishnan Genart Telechat review of -?? by Suresh Krishnan Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Vincent Roca Secdir Telechat review of -?? by Vincent Roca Tsvdir Last Call review of -?? by Cullen Fluffy Jennings |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Suresh Krishnan |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-simple-chat by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Completed | 2012-02-27 |
review-ietf-simple-chat-genart-lc-krishnan-2012-02-27-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-simple-chat-13.txt For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html >. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but I have a few comments. Section 3: REQ-3: It is unclear why this is separate from REQ-2. In my reading, REQ-2 already covers REQ-3. Section 6.1 This sentence is not clear. Can you clarify/reword. "Having the header of the Message/CPIM wrapper only in the first chunk, the MSRP switch MUST track the Message-Id until the last chunk of the message has been distributed." Thanks Suresh