Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-simple-chat-
review-ietf-simple-chat-genart-lc-krishnan-2012-02-27-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-simple-chat
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2012-02-06
Requested 2012-02-10
Authors Aki Niemi , Miguel Angel García , Geir Sandbakken
I-D last updated 2012-02-27
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -?? by Christer Holmberg
Genart Last Call review of -?? by Suresh Krishnan
Genart Telechat review of -?? by Suresh Krishnan
Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Vincent Roca
Secdir Telechat review of -?? by Vincent Roca
Tsvdir Last Call review of -?? by Cullen Fluffy Jennings
Assignment Reviewer Suresh Krishnan
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-simple-chat by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Completed 2012-02-27
review-ietf-simple-chat-genart-lc-krishnan-2012-02-27-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
draft-ietf-simple-chat-13.txt

For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<

http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html

>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but
I have a few comments.

Section 3:

REQ-3: It is unclear why this is separate from REQ-2. In my reading,
REQ-2 already covers REQ-3.

Section 6.1

This sentence is not clear. Can you clarify/reword.

"Having the header of the Message/CPIM wrapper only in the first chunk,
the MSRP switch MUST track the Message-Id until the last chunk of the
message has been distributed."

Thanks
Suresh