Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00
review-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00-genart-lc-taylor-2015-06-18-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 00) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2015-06-17 | |
| Requested | 2015-06-04 | |
| Authors | Adam Roach | |
| I-D last updated | 2015-06-18 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -00
by Tom Taylor
Secdir Last Call review of -00 by Hilarie Orman Opsdir Last Call review of -00 by Tim Wicinski |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Tom Taylor |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 00 | |
| Result | Ready w/issues | |
| Completed | 2015-06-18 |
review-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00-genart-lc-taylor-2015-06-18-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00 Reviewer: Tom Taylor Review Date: 17 June 2015 IETF LC End Date: 17 June 2015 IESG Telechat date: 25 June 2015 Summary: This is a very short document expanding on a sentence in RFC 6665 to make clear the requirements surrounding use of GRUUs in the SIP event framework. It is probably good to go except for a minor issue of terminology that needs clarification. The reviewer apologizes for not being current on that terminology if it is a matter of common usage. Major issues: None. Minor issues: The term "local target" is used in the text (and in RFC 6665. RFC 3261 speaks of a remote target, but not a local one. In which document is "local target" defined? Nits/editorial comments: None.