Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-name-addr-guidance-01
review-ietf-sipcore-name-addr-guidance-01-genart-lc-dupont-2017-06-06-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-sipcore-name-addr-guidance |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 02) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2017-06-01 | |
Requested | 2017-05-18 | |
Authors | Robert Sparks | |
I-D last updated | 2017-06-06 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -01
by Francis Dupont
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -01 by Bert Wijnen (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Chris M. Lonvick |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Francis Dupont |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-sipcore-name-addr-guidance by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 02) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2017-06-06 |
review-ietf-sipcore-name-addr-guidance-01-genart-lc-dupont-2017-06-06-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-name-addr-guidance-01.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20170601 IETF LC End Date: 20170601 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: - 2 and 3 page 4: for curiosity, why did you change the order between ",;?"? (BTW what matters is to have a consistent order and it is the case) Regards Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr