Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-name-addr-guidance-01
review-ietf-sipcore-name-addr-guidance-01-genart-lc-dupont-2017-06-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-name-addr-guidance
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 02)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-06-01
Requested 2017-05-18
Other Reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -01 by Bert Wijnen (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Chris Lonvick
Review State Completed
Reviewer Francis Dupont
Review review-ietf-sipcore-name-addr-guidance-01-genart-lc-dupont-2017-06-06
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/J7110kFBrRPZZLyi3183GJ0FiiY
Reviewed rev. 01 (document currently at 02)
Review result Ready
Draft last updated 2017-06-06
Review completed: 2017-06-06

Review
review-ietf-sipcore-name-addr-guidance-01-genart-lc-dupont-2017-06-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-name-addr-guidance-01.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170601
IETF LC End Date: 20170601
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: 
 - 2 and 3 page 4: for curiosity, why did you change the order between ",;?"?
  (BTW what matters is to have a consistent order and it is the case)

Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr