Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-priority-00
review-ietf-sipcore-priority-00-genart-lc-romascanu-2013-01-06-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-sipcore-priority |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 00) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2013-01-07 | |
Requested | 2012-12-27 | |
Authors | Adam Roach | |
I-D last updated | 2013-01-06 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -00
by Dan Romascanu
|
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Dan Romascanu |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-sipcore-priority by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 00 | |
Result | Ready w/issues | |
Completed | 2013-01-06 |
review-ietf-sipcore-priority-00-genart-lc-romascanu-2013-01-06-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-priority-00 Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 1/6/13 IETF LC End Date: 1/7/13 IESG Telechat date: 1/10/13 Summary: ready for publication, one minor issue Major issues: none Minor issues: In the IANA considerations section this document requires IANA to create a new registry with the suggested name "Priority Header Field Values". For clarity purposes, taking into account that other protocols may also carry priority fields in headers, I suggest that a better name would be "SIP Priority Header Field Values" Nits/editorial comments: Regards, Dan