Last Call Review of draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-14
review-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-14-opsdir-lc-korhonen-2017-01-10-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 18) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2017-01-12 | |
| Requested | 2016-12-29 | |
| Authors | Mohamed Boucadair , Jacni Qin , Christian Jacquenet , Yiu Lee , Qian Wang | |
| I-D last updated | 2017-01-10 | |
| Completed reviews |
Intdir Early review of -12
by Zhen Cao
(diff)
Intdir Early review of -12 by Tim Chown (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -14 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) Genart Last Call review of -14 by Francis Dupont (diff) Rtgdir Telechat review of -14 by Stig Venaas (diff) Genart Telechat review of -16 by Francis Dupont (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -16 by Tim Chown (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Jouni Korhonen |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 14 (document currently at 18) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2017-01-10 |
review-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-14-opsdir-lc-korhonen-2017-01-10-00
I found no issues in this specification (not that I would be an expert in multicast). IDnits complain about one instance of lines with non-rfc3849-compliant IPv6 addresses. That should be verified whether it actually is an issue. On the operations side, I am happy with the current deployment considerations section content, and in general how some of the deployment/operational aspects have been laid out in the document.