Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-14
review-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-14-opsdir-lc-korhonen-2017-01-10-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2017-01-12
Requested 2016-12-29
Authors Mohamed Boucadair , Jacni Qin , Christian Jacquenet , Yiu Lee , Qian Wang
I-D last updated 2017-01-10
Completed reviews Intdir Early review of -12 by Zhen Cao (diff)
Intdir Early review of -12 by Tim Chown (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -14 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -14 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Rtgdir Telechat review of -14 by Stig Venaas (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -16 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -16 by Tim Chown (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Jouni Korhonen
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 14 (document currently at 18)
Result Ready
Completed 2017-01-10
review-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-14-opsdir-lc-korhonen-2017-01-10-00
I found no issues in this specification (not that I would be an expert in
multicast). IDnits complain about one instance of lines with
non-rfc3849-compliant IPv6 addresses. That should be verified whether it
actually is an issue.

On the operations side, I am happy with the current deployment considerations
section content, and in general how some of the deployment/operational aspects
have been laid out in the document.