Early Review of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-03
|Requested rev.||no specific revision (document currently at 07)|
|Team||YANG Doctors (yangdoctors)|
|Requested by||Éric Vyncke|
|Authors||Mohamed Boucadair, Ian Farrer, Rajiv Asati|
|Draft last updated||2019-04-03|
Yangdoctors Early review of -03 by Andy Bierman
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Dale Worley (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Yaron Sheffer (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -04 by David Black (diff)
Mainly around readability and structure of the YANG modules. Thank you.
|Reviewed rev.||03 (document currently at 07)|
|Review result||Ready with Nits|
The iana-tunnel-type module has no errors or nits of any kind. The ietf-extension-example module has no errors of any kind, and 1 nit. The document appears to follow all YANG usage guidelines (but 1) correctly. I have a minor comment about the example module. I guess it has to use <CODE BEGINS>. (The <EXAMPLE BEGINS> discussion did not go anywhere). This module looks a little too real to average users, especially after tools extract it from the RFC and put it in the YangModels repo under the standard/ietf/RFC directory. You should rename the ietf-extension-example module to example-iftunnel-extension (or anything starting with "example-"). The module should not begin with "ietf-" unless it is a real module.