Early Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11
review-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11-intdir-early-weber-2016-12-14-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
Type | Early Review | |
Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
Deadline | 2016-12-29 | |
Requested | 2016-11-29 | |
Authors | Mohamed Boucadair , Jacni Qin , Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU) , Xiaohong Deng | |
I-D last updated | 2016-12-14 | |
Completed reviews |
Intdir Early review of -11
by Ralf Weber
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Sheng Jiang (diff) Genart Last Call review of -11 by Roni Even (diff) Genart Telechat review of -12 by Roni Even (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Ralf Weber |
State | Completed | |
Request | Early review on draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 11 (document currently at 15) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2016-12-14 |
review-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11-intdir-early-weber-2016-12-14-00
Moin! I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-foo.txt>. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html. I've read the document and see no issues with it. One minor nit that might clarify things is in section 3 when explaining option length. This is in octets while the other lengths in the option are bit mask. Might be worth spelling out. So long -Ralf