Last Call Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11
review-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11-opsdir-lc-jiang-2017-01-09-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2017-01-12 | |
Requested | 2016-12-29 | |
Authors | Mohamed Boucadair , Jacni Qin , Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU) , Xiaohong Deng | |
Draft last updated | 2017-01-09 | |
Completed reviews |
Intdir Early review of -11
by Ralf Weber
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Sheng Jiang (diff) Genart Last Call review of -11 by Roni Even (diff) Genart Telechat review of -12 by Roni Even (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Sheng Jiang |
State | Completed | |
Review |
review-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11-opsdir-lc-jiang-2017-01-09
|
|
Reviewed revision | 11 (document currently at 15) | |
Result | Has Nits | |
Completed | 2017-01-09 |
review-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11-opsdir-lc-jiang-2017-01-09-00
Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a standard track RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: “the specification of a DHCPv6 option that could be used to discover unicast PREFIX64s in environments where multicast is not enabled. Such side effect conflicts with the recommendation documented in Section 6 of [RFC7051].” It is unclear how the Section 6 of RFC7051 relevant with the content above. It would be necessary to quote particular content of RFC7051 and give necessary analysis. Nits: “the Pv4 multicast address is inserted in the last 32 bits of the IPv4-embedded IPv6 multicast address.” Pv4//IPv4