IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-spice-glue-id-04
review-ietf-spice-glue-id-04-secdir-lc-yee-2026-02-15-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-spice-glue-id |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2026-02-10 | |
| Requested | 2026-01-27 | |
| Authors | Brent Zundel , Pamela Dingle , Michael B. Jones | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-03-05 (Latest revision 2026-03-04) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -04
by Susan Hares
(diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -04 by Patrik Fältström (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -04 by Peter E. Yee (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -05 by Peter E. Yee (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Peter E. Yee |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-spice-glue-id by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/IYGXoyOVBsXFhTPPRDevflQ3vhQ | |
| Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 07) | |
| Result | Has issues | |
| Completed | 2026-02-15 |
review-ietf-spice-glue-id-04-secdir-lc-yee-2026-02-15-00
Document: draft-ietf-spice-glue-id Title: YANG Data Model for Scheduled Attributes Reviewer: Peter Yee Review result: Has Issue This draft creates a GLobal Unique Enterprise (GLUE) URN namespace, registers it with IANA, and makes some initial Authority Identifier registrations within that namespace. The document is simply written, and I did not find any security concerns with it. Aside from a couple of nits, I have one issue that’s only marginally worth considering around the DE criteria. Major issues: None Minor issues: Page 7, last paragraph: what’s the definition of “sense” at the end of this sentence? That’s awfully vague. Nits: Page 3, section 1, 1st paragraph, 1st sentence: change “a myriad of” to “myriad”. Alternatively, change “are a myriad” to “is a myriad”. Page 5, 1st paragraph, 1st sentence: as a purely aesthetic choice, consider swapping the order of ‘period (“.”)’ and ‘hyphen (“-“)’ in the sentence to match the ABNF. The same applies for the following paragraph on External Identifiers. Utterly inconsequential, I know.